<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World of Warcraft: New Models on the Horizon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixohthree.com/395/models/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixohthree.com/395/models</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Adam Backstrom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:48:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimman</title>
		<link>http://sixohthree.com/395/models/comment-page-1#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>grimman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bwerp.net/archives/2007/02/16/models#comment-608</guid>
		<description>They are noticeably lower poly models, first of all, and lack the polish of the retail models imo. Perhaps the Blizzard design team decided it was simply easier to redo from scratch than to touch the old ones up. Leaving them in the resource files isn&#039;t something Blizzard is alone in doing. ;)
I have a pretty big archive of old WoW beta screenshots, and I immediately recognized the female2 model/texture, so I can pretty much back Galivice up in his statement. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are noticeably lower poly models, first of all, and lack the polish of the retail models imo. Perhaps the Blizzard design team decided it was simply easier to redo from scratch than to touch the old ones up. Leaving them in the resource files isn&#8217;t something Blizzard is alone in doing. <img src='http://sixohthree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I have a pretty big archive of old WoW beta screenshots, and I immediately recognized the female2 model/texture, so I can pretty much back Galivice up in his statement. <img src='http://sixohthree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Backstrom</title>
		<link>http://sixohthree.com/395/models/comment-page-1#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Backstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bwerp.net/archives/2007/02/16/models#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I wonder why they haven&#039;t been used until now, and what made them use these models instead of the traditional ones available to players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I wonder why they haven&#8217;t been used until now, and what made them use these models instead of the traditional ones available to players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galivice</title>
		<link>http://sixohthree.com/395/models/comment-page-1#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Galivice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bwerp.net/archives/2007/02/16/models#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Please note that those &quot;new models&quot; you&#039;ve shown have been present almost since game relase, if not since then. &#160;Download Wow Model Viewer, open the creatures category and everything that starts with HUMF (for human female) or HUMM (for human male) is a model not used/rarely used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that those &#8220;new models&#8221; you&#8217;ve shown have been present almost since game relase, if not since then. &nbsp;Download Wow Model Viewer, open the creatures category and everything that starts with HUMF (for human female) or HUMM (for human male) is a model not used/rarely used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

